MA.912.DP.3.1

Construct a two-way frequency table summarizing bivariate categorical data. Interpret joint and marginal frequencies and determine possible associations in terms of a real-world context.

Examples

Algebra 1 Example: Complete the frequency table below. 

  Has an A in mathDoesn't have an A in math  Total
 Plays an instrument 20  90
 Doesn't play an instrument 20  
 Total   350

Using the information in the table, it is possible to determine that the second column contains the numbers 70 and 240. This means that there are 70 students who play an instrument but do not have an A in math and the total number of students who play an instrument is 90. The ratio of the joint frequencies in the first column is 1 to 1 and the ratio in the second column is 7 to 24, indicating a strong positive association between playing an instrument and getting an A in math.


General Information
Subject Area: Mathematics (B.E.S.T.)
Grade: 912
Strand: Data Analysis and Probability
Date Adopted or Revised: 08/20
Status: State Board Approved

Benchmark Instructional Guide

Connecting Benchmarks/Horizontal Alignment

 

Terms from the K-12 Glossary

  • Bivariate data 
  • Categorical data 
  • Joint frequency 
  • Joint relative frequency
 

Vertical Alignment

Previous Benchmarks 

Next Benchmarks

 

Purpose and Instructional Strategies

In grade 8, students began their exploration of bivariate data. Students focused on informally finding the line of fit. In Algebra I, students studied bivariate categorical data and displayed it in tables showing joint frequencies and marginal frequencies. In Mathematics for College Statistics, students continue this exploration with the use of real-world data. 
  • Instruction includes the connection to MA.912.DP.1.1 where students work with categorical bivariate data and display it in tables. A two-way frequency table is just a way to display frequencies jointly for two categories. 
  • In later courses, students may hear the term for two-way tables as contingency tables. Instruction includes the use of both terms interchangeably so that students are familiar with them. 
  • Students are expected to interpret the joint and marginal frequencies and therefore must know the differences between these two. 
    • Marginal frequencies 
      • Entries in the “Total” row and “Total” columns are called marginal frequencies. The areas highlighted in yellow in the table below represents the marginal frequencies. 
        Table
    • Joint frequencies 
      • Entries in the body of the table represent joint frequencies. The area highlighted in yellow in the table represents the joint frequencies. 
        Table
  • Instruction includes students creating two-way (contingency) tables from data that has either been collected or researched. Students can then analyze the data by either examining joint relative frequencies or marginal relative frequencies. 
  • Instruction includes determining possible association. Two categorical variables are associated if the row of conditional relative frequencies (or column of relative frequencies) are different for the rows (or columns) of the table. Evidence of an association is strongest when the conditional relative frequencies are quite different. If the conditional relative frequencies are nearly equal for all categories, then there is probably not an association between variables. 
  • Instruction includes determining if variables are independent. If the conditional relative frequencies are nearly equal for all categories, there may be no association between the variables and they are said to be independent.
  • Instruction includes experience with the Simpson’s Paradox. Simpson’s Paradox is an association or comparison that holds for all of several groups can reverse direction when the data are combined to form a single group. 
    • For example, a university was concerned with the number of females who were being accepted into their graduate programs. Of the 384 men who applied to the school, 285 were admitted which is an admission rate of 74.2%. Of the 435 women who applied to the school, 126 were admitted which is an admission rate of 29.0%. This may suggest there is a bias where men are favored in graduate admissions. However, upon closer inspection of the graduate programs they offered, the following was discovered: 
      Table
    • When looking at the individual programs and comparing the acceptance rate of women versus that of men, they noticed that more women were being accepted into these programs then men were. This is an example of a Simpson’s Paradox. When the data is combined into a single group, we get one result. When the data is divided into several groups, the results are reversed.
 

Common Misconceptions or Errors

  • Students may have difficulty when completing the table based on the given data. 
  • Students may not distinguish the differences between marginal and joint frequencies. 
  • Students may make errors when identifying the relationship and possible associations in the data in terms of the given context. 
  • Students may find the relative joint frequencies of the column only and not realize that to find the relative joint frequency depends on what is being analyzed and could be based on the row.
 

Strategies to Support Tiered Instruction

Instructional Tasks

Instructional Task 1 (MTR.3.1, MTR.7.1
The U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration performed a National Household Travel Survey. Within that survey, they looked at trends in the annual number (millions) of person trip by mode of transportation. The following is the data from 2017  (https://nhts.ornl.gov/assets/2017_nhts_summary_travel_trends.pdf ): 
  • Private Vehicle: to and from work: 56,981; work-related business: 4,844; shopping and errands: 126,268; school or church: 28,427; social and recreational: 78,890; other: 10,988 
  • Public Transit: to and from work: 3,537; work-related business: 208; shopping and errands: 2,586; school or church: 1,009; social and recreational: 1,618; other: 487 
  • Walk: to and from work: 2,523; work-related business: 510; shopping and errands: 11,496; school or church: 4,146; social and recreational: 18,483; other: 1,790 
  • Other: to and from work: 1,540; work-related business: 486; shopping and errands: 2,404; school and church: 6,721; social and recreational: 3,330; other: 1,873 
  • Part A. Create a contingency table using the data provided. 
  • Part B. What is the joint relative frequency of people who used public transit traveled for work related business? 
  • Part C. What is the marginal relative frequency of those who traveled for shopping and errands? 
  • Part D. What is the joint relative frequency of people who traveled to and from work by using a private vehicle? 
  • Part E. Which mode of transportation was most popular as it relates to social and recreational trips? 
  • Part F. Does the data show an association between using a personal vehicle and going to school or church? Justify your reasoning.

 

Instructional Items

Instructional Item 1 
The results from a survey about whether students (male or female) at a university were from England, Wales or Scotland is summarized in the following two-way table: 

Table
  • Part A. Complete the table with the totals. 
  • Part B. What proportion of the students are women? 
  • Part C. What proportion of students are from Wales? 
  • Part D. Is it fair to say that more students from Wales are women? Explain your reasoning.


*The strategies, tasks and items included in the B1G-M are examples and should not be considered comprehensive.

Related Courses

This benchmark is part of these courses.
1200310: Algebra 1 (Specifically in versions: 2014 - 2015, 2015 - 2022, 2022 and beyond (current))
1200320: Algebra 1 Honors (Specifically in versions: 2014 - 2015, 2015 - 2022, 2022 and beyond (current))
1200380: Algebra 1-B (Specifically in versions: 2014 - 2015, 2015 - 2022, 2022 and beyond (current))
1200400: Foundational Skills in Mathematics 9-12 (Specifically in versions: 2014 - 2015, 2015 - 2022, 2022 and beyond (current))
1210300: Probability and Statistics Honors (Specifically in versions: 2014 - 2015, 2015 - 2019, 2019 - 2022, 2022 and beyond (current))
7912090: Access Algebra 1B (Specifically in versions: 2014 - 2015, 2015 - 2018, 2018 - 2019, 2019 - 2022, 2022 and beyond (current))
1200315: Algebra 1 for Credit Recovery (Specifically in versions: 2014 - 2015, 2015 - 2022, 2022 and beyond (current))
1200385: Algebra 1-B for Credit Recovery (Specifically in versions: 2014 - 2015, 2015 - 2022, 2022 and beyond (current))
7912075: Access Algebra 1 (Specifically in versions: 2014 - 2015, 2015 - 2018, 2018 - 2019, 2019 - 2022, 2022 and beyond (current))
1210305: Mathematics for College Statistics (Specifically in versions: 2022 and beyond (current))
1200388: Mathematics for Data and Financial Literacy Honors (Specifically in versions: 2022 and beyond (current))
1200384: Mathematics for Data and Financial Literacy (Specifically in versions: 2022 and beyond (current))
7912120: Access Mathematics for Data and Financial Literacy (Specifically in versions: 2022 - 2023, 2023 and beyond (current))

Related Access Points

Alternate version of this benchmark for students with significant cognitive disabilities.
MA.912.DP.3.AP.1: When given a two-way frequency table summarizing bivariate categorical data, identify joint and marginal frequencies.

Related Resources

Vetted resources educators can use to teach the concepts and skills in this benchmark.

Formative Assessments

Two-Way Relative Frequency Table:

Students are asked to convert raw data to relative frequencies by both rows and columns given a two-way frequency table.

Type: Formative Assessment

Music and Sports:

Students are asked to construct a two-way frequency table given a set of raw data.

Type: Formative Assessment

Marginal and Joint Frequency:

Students are asked to use a two-way frequency table to interpret marginal and joint relative frequencies.

Type: Formative Assessment

Who Is a Vegetarian?:

Students are given a two-way frequency table and asked to determine if there is a relationship between the two variables.

Type: Formative Assessment

Breakfast Drink Preference:

Students are asked to use data from a survey to create a two-way frequency table.

Type: Formative Assessment

Lesson Plan

Two-Way Math Survey:

In this lesson, students will construct a two-way table based on data given. They will interpret the data to find if there is a correlation between the two variables from the same subject. As the lesson progresses, students will create their own testable questions that they will collect data on using the survey method. Students will show their mastery of this math concept with the presentation of the data in a two-way table and interpretation of the data to draw inferences.

Type: Lesson Plan

MFAS Formative Assessments

Breakfast Drink Preference:

Students are asked to use data from a survey to create a two-way frequency table.

Marginal and Joint Frequency:

Students are asked to use a two-way frequency table to interpret marginal and joint relative frequencies.

Music and Sports:

Students are asked to construct a two-way frequency table given a set of raw data.

Two-Way Relative Frequency Table:

Students are asked to convert raw data to relative frequencies by both rows and columns given a two-way frequency table.

Who Is a Vegetarian?:

Students are given a two-way frequency table and asked to determine if there is a relationship between the two variables.

Student Resources

Vetted resources students can use to learn the concepts and skills in this benchmark.

Parent Resources

Vetted resources caregivers can use to help students learn the concepts and skills in this benchmark.