LA.6.1.7.7Archived Standard

The student will compare and contrast elements in multiple texts; and
General Information
Subject Area: X-Reading/Language Arts (former standards - 2008)
Grade: 6
Strand: Reading Process
Standard: Reading Comprehension - The student uses a variety of strategies to comprehend grade level text.
Date Adopted or Revised: 01/07
Status: State Board Approved - Archived
Assessed: Yes
Test Item Specifications
  • Item Type(s): This benchmark may be assessed using: MC item(s)

  • Clarification :
    The student will identify similarities between elements within or across texts or will identify differences between elements within or across texts.
  • Content Limits :
    Grade-level appropriate texts should include elements that can be compared or contrasted and may include, but are not limited to, character, setting, descriptive language, subject, author’s purpose, author’s perspective, main idea, and themes and topics.
  • Content Focus :
    Compare (similarities within/across texts)
    Contrast (differences within/across texts)
  • Text Attributes :
    Texts should be literary or informational. 

    Other stimuli may include, but are not limited to, illustrations with captions, graphics, and charts. 

    Texts should provide sufficient information that establishes a clear relationship between the similarities or a clear relationship between the differences. 

    Texts should include elements that compare and/or contrast. To assess this benchmark across texts, items should be based on two related texts that contain elements that can be compared or contrasted. 

    To assess this benchmark within a text, items should be based on elements that can be compared or contrasted.

  • Distractor Attributes :
    Distractors may include, but are not limited to
    • incorrect comparisons;
    • incorrect contrasts;
    • similarities or differences that are drawn from the text but not related to the test question;
    • facts and details that are drawn from the text but unrelated to the test question; and
    • plausible but incorrect distractors based on the text.

    Note: In a comparison item, distractors should not contrast elements. In a contrast item, distractors should not compare elements.

    Note: For differentiating between Benchmark LA.6.1.7.7 and Benchmark LA.6.6.2.2, items that require students to compare or contrast specific details within the text should be aligned with Benchmark LA.6.1.7.7. Items that require students to synthesize similarities or differences and to draw conclusions from those similarities or differences within or across text(s) should be aligned with Benchmark LA.6.6.2.2.

Sample Test Items (2)
  • Test Item #: Sample Item 1
  • Question: The sample item below is based on “Ben’s Harmonica” on page H–2.

    How are Forrage and Davies similar?
  • Difficulty: N/A
  • Type: MC: Multiple Choice

  • Test Item #: Sample Item 2
  • Question: The sample item below is based on “New Kid” on page H–4.

    When the passage begins, how is Michael’s view of table tennis different from Kayla’s?
  • Difficulty: N/A
  • Type: MC: Multiple Choice

Related Access Points

Alternate version of this benchmark for students with significant cognitive disabilities.

Related Resources

Vetted resources educators can use to teach the concepts and skills in this benchmark.

Student Resources

Vetted resources students can use to learn the concepts and skills in this benchmark.

Parent Resources

Vetted resources caregivers can use to help students learn the concepts and skills in this benchmark.